Performativity on the Net: “Protocological Management” and the “Societies of Control”

Martin Procházka

FULL TEXT

CC BY 4.0

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

ABSTRACT (en)

In contrast to Foucault’s concept of “the political technologies of individuals,” the Internet protocol (theorised, e.g., by Alexander Galloway) can be interpreted as an instance of a political technology of “dividuals” (Gilles Deleuze). The performance of protocols, or the execution of “distributed management”, is based – among others – on a problematic identification of life with a code and a medium. It is believed to generate a new form of life, described as a “cybernetic system of man and machine” (Galloway) and a new type of individual who differs from the subject of the Enlightenment liberalism. On the one hand, these individuals are mere “body-objects,” on the other hand they are endowed by a power of resistance. This is paradoxical, if not absurd, since “by definition, there can be no resistance to protocol” (Galloway). The most problematic example of “protocological management” is the technique of “collaborative filtering” (typical of the “recommendation engines”), which opens the network to homogenizing manipulation of political or economic forces. Individuals active on the net are processed into “dividuals” (or sets of statistical data comprised in their diverse profiles), whose “personal identity is formed only on certain hegemonic patterns” (Galloway). As a result, the “bio-political self-organization” of “the multitude” (Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri), is supplanted by the operation of social media platforms. These function as “plateaus of intensity,” which construct “continuums of intensity” (Deleuze and Guattari) out of the affects, emotions and desires of their users, who have become “dividuals.” The social media platforms enable “the operation of markets,” both economic and political, to function as “the instrument of social control” (Deleuze).

KEYWORDS (en)

biopolitics, Internet protocol, protocological management, distributed network, society of control, dividuals, collaborative filtering, recommendation engines, Gilles Deleuze, Alexander Galloway

DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/2571452X.2025.70.11

SOURCES

Brenner, Naama et al. “Synergy in a Neural Code.” Neural Computing 12, no. 7 (2000): 1531-52.

Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control” (1990). Translated by Martin Joughin. October 59, no. 4 (1992): 3-7.

Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (1980). Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN, and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

“DNA computing.” Wikipedia. Accessed 23 July 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/DNA_computing. Foucault, Michel. History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (1976). Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 1978.

Foucault, Michel. “The Political Technologies of Individuals.” In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman and Patrick H. Hutton, 145-62. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988.

Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-79 (2004). Translated by Graham Burchell. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

Galloway, Alexander R. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 2004.

Guattari, Félix. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-aesthetic Paradigm (1992). Translated by Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.

Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Kreer, J. et al. “A Question of Terminology.” IRE Transactions on Information Technology 3, no. 3 (1957): 208.

Kwinter, Sanford. “Introduction: War in Peace.” In Pandemonium: The Rise of Predatory Locales in the Postwar Period, edited by Branden Hookway, 9-15. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Li, Jiaqui, et al. “A Survey of Discourse Parsing.” Frontiers of Computer Science 16, no. 5 (2022): 1-12.

Magerman, David M. and Mitchell P. Marcus. “Parsing a Natural Language Using Mutual Information Statistics.” In AAAI-90 Proceedings of the Eight National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 984-89. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press and MIT Press, 1990.

Nail, Thomas. Theory of the Border. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Ortega y Gasset, José. The Revolt of the Masses (1930). New York: W.W. Norton, 1932.

Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.

Schrage, Michael. Recommendation Engines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.

Shannon, Claude E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27, no. 3 (1948): 379-423.

Sterling, Bruce. The Hacker Crackdown. New York: Bantam Books, 1992.

Su, Xiaoyuan and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar. “A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques.” Advances in Artificial Intelligence 1 (2009): 1-19.

Terveen, Loreen and Will Hill. “Beyond Recommender Systems: Helping Other People Help Each Other.” In Human-computer Interaction in the New Millenium, edited by John M. Carroll, 487-505. New York: ACM Press and Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2001.

Thacker, Eugene. “Foreword: Protocol Is as Protocol Does.” In Galloway, Alexander R. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization, xi-xxii. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 2004.

Watkinson, John et al. “Inference of Regulatory Gene Interactions from Expression Data Using Three-Way Mutual Information.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1158, no. 1 (2009): 302-13.

Wiener, Norbert. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1954.