Despite ongoing critical debates, performance-oriented practice of teaching intercultural communicative competence, including influential models of Michael Byram and especially Geert Hofstede, often relies on static and essentialised cultural models and disregarding the idea of culture as an emergent phenomenon. Focusing on Hofstede’s 6D model, the article discusses the theory and practice of teaching intercultural communicative competence as part of English for Specific Purposes within the context of business and management studies in light of philosophical perspectives drawn from the ethics of dialogic personalism (Levinas, Ricœur) and Wolfgang Iser’s literary anthropology. The aim of the discussion is to provide teachers and practitioners with a relevant theoretical framework as well as pedagogic perspectives necessary for using potentially problematic cultural models in a way which is both efficient and theoretically viable.
Intercultural communicative competence, culture as emergent phenomenon, Emmanuel Levinas, Wolfgang Iser, Geert Hofstede
Byram, Michael. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communication Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997.
Byram, Michael, Bella Gribkova and Hugh Starkey. Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching: A Practical Introduction for Teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2002. https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1c3.
Dervin, Fred. “Assessing Intercultural Competence in Language Learning and Teaching: A Critical Review of Current Efforts in Higher Education.” New Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education. Edited by Fred Dervin and Eija Suomela-Salmi. 157-74. Bern: Peter Lang, 2010.
Ferri, Giulliana. “Ethical Communication and Intercultural Responsibility: A Philosophical Perspective.” Language and Intercultural Communication 14, no. 1 (2014): 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.866121.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London and New York: Continuum, 2006.
Hoff, Hild E. “A Critical Discussion of Byram’s Model of Intercultural Communicative Competence in the Light of Bildung Theories.” Intercultural Education 25, no. 6 (2014): 508-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.992112.
Hofstede, Geert. “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, no. 1 (2011): 2-26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
Hofstede Insights. “Compare Countries.” Accessed 30 April 2022. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/fi/product/ compare-countries/.
Hofstede Insights. “National Culture.” Accessed 30 April 2022. https://hi.hofstedeinsights.com/national-culture.
Iser, Wolfgang. The Range of Interpretation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
Iser, Wolfgang. “What Is Literary Anthropology? The Difference betweenExplanatory and Exploratory Fictions.” Revenge of the Aesthetic: The Place of Literature in Theory Today. Edited by Michael P. Clark. 157-79. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.
Kern, Richard. Language, Literacy, and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Kimball, Stephanie, and Jim Garrison. “Hermeneutic Listening: An Approach to Understanding in Multicultural Conversations.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 15 (1996): 51-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367513.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2007.
MacDonald, Malcolm N., and John P. O’Regan. “The Ethics of Intercultural Communication.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 45, no. 10 (2012): 1005-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.753377.
Matsuo, Catherine. “A Critique of Michael Byram’s Intercultural Communicative Competence Model from the Perspective of Model Type and Challenging Intercultural Communicative Competence Conceptualization of Culture.” Fukuoka University Review of Literature & Humanities 44 (2012): 347-80.
Matsuo, Catherine. “A Dialogic Critique of Michael Byram’s Intercultural Communicative Competence Model: Proposal for a Dialogic Pedagogy.” Comprehensive Study on Language Education Methods and Cross-linguistic Proficiency Evaluation Methods for Asian Languages: Final Report 2014. Edited by Nobuo Tomimori. 3-22. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies Grants-inAid for Scientific Research (B), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 2015.
McSweeney, Brendan. “A Triumph of Faith – A Failure of Analysis: Hofstede´s model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences.” Human Relations 55, no. 1 (2002): 89-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004.
McSweeney, Brendan. “Dynamic Diversity: Variety and Variation withinCountries.” Organization Studies 30, no. 9 (2009): 933-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609338983.
O’Dowd, Robert. “Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future of Online Intercultural Exchange.” Online Intercultural Exchange: Policy, Pedagogy, Practice. Edited by Robert O’Dowd and Tim Lewis. 273-93. Routledge: London, 2016.
Richardson, Virginia. “Constructivist Pedagogy.” Teachers College Record 105, no. 9 (2003): 1623-40, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x.
Ricœur, Paul. Oneself as Other. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Riquelme, John Paul. “Wolfgang Iser’s Aesthetic Politics: Reading as Fieldwork.” New Literary History 31, no.1 (Winter 2000): 7-12. https://liternet.bg/iser/nlhriquel.htm.
Roy, Abhik, and William J. Starosta. “Hans-Georg Gadamer, Language, and Intercultural Communication.” Language and Intercultural Communication 1, no. 1 (2001): 6-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470108668060.
Sulkowski, Lukasz. Epistemology of Management. Bern: Peter Lang, 2013.
Weinsheimer, Joel, and Donald G. Marshall. “Translator’s Preface.” Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. xi–xix. London and New York: Continuum, 2006.