>LITTERARIA PRAGENSIA 2025 (35) 70
CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ABSTRACT (en)
This article focuses on the history of the performativity of cinema, a technical medium that, by definition, excludes traditionally understood forms of performativity. Central to this inquiry – drawing on Dieter Mersch’s and Vilém Flusser’s theories – is the identification of moments when filmmakers employ technology non-technically, against its prescribed use. Such camera gestures can be understood in relation to the original meaning of technē, which does not signify mere making, fabrication, or utilization of tools, but rather the revealing or uncovering of the truth of things. The core of the article is the camera in the hands of feminist filmmakers, whose performative camera use attempts to discover a feminine handwriting and an autonomous expressive mode. The classical, male-dominated cinematic narrative can be disrupted through long takes, unconventional axes of movement, unusual distances and angles, panoramic rotation of the camera, and recording with atypical devices, techniques, and technologies. The camera is no longer hidden and concealed; on the contrary, it is made visible, emphasized, and presented to viewers as a means of demonstrating alternative possibilities. Such a camera may be used for thinking differently – subversively, expressively, experimentally, and, crucially for this study, performatively. The camera comes to the foreground, interrupting and unsettling. This article shows how this performative camera has been realized in the work of selected women filmmakers and asks what role it might serve today, how it might reveal other perspectives and offer new modes of negotiation with the technology that continuously surrounds us.
KEYWORDS (en)
performativity, cinema, operativity, feminism, l’écriture féminine, women filmmakers, motion picture camera
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/2571452X.2025.70.8
SOURCES
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Aparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, 85-126. London: Monthly Review Press, 1971.
Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.
Balsom, Erika. “Between Art and Film: Revisiting the Exhibition, ‘Passages de l’image.’” Mousse Magazine, 7 March 2022. Accessed 12 December 2025. https://www.moussemagazine.it/magazine/between-art-and-film-revisiting-the-exhibition-passages-de-limage-erika- balsom-2022/.
Bordwell, David, Janet Steiger and Kristin Thompson. The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960. London: Routledge, 1985.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge, 1990.
Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa” (1975). Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1, no. 4 (Summer 1976): 875-93.
Comolli, Jean-Louis and Jean Narboni, “Cinema/Ideology/Criticism.” In Movies and Methods: An Anthology, edited by Bill Nichols, 22-30. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1976.
Čihák, Martin. Ponorná řeka kinematografie [A Subterranean River of Cinematography]. Prague: AMU, 2013.
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” In A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds, edited by Peggy Kamuf, 80-111. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Elsaesser, Thomas. Film History as Media Archaeology: Tracking Digital Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016.
Felcman, Jakub. “Kino v psacím stroji. Fenomén fiktivního scénáře v českém prostředí” [Movie in a Typewriter: Fictitious Script in Czech Culture]. MA thesis. Charles University, Prague, 2006.
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. “Für eine Ästhetik des Performativen.” In Kultur – Analysen, edited by Jörg Huber, 21-43. Zürich: Institut für Theorie der Gestaltung und Kunst, 2001.
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics (Ästhetik der Performativen, 2004). Translated by Saskya Iris Jain. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
Gunning, Tom. “An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Cinema and the (In)credulous Spectator.” Art & Text no. 34 (1989): 31-45.
Heczková, Libuše and Kateřina Svatoňová. “Ostranenie Does Not Equal Ozvláštnění: An Issue of a Term Transferred and Misunderstood.” Slovo a smysl / Word and Sense 12, no. 24 (2015): 50-58.
Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology” (Die Frage nach der Technik, 1954). In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, 3-35. New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1977.
Hölderlin, Friedrich. “The Ground for Empedocles” (Grund zum Empedokles, 1799). In Essays and Letters on Theory, edited and translated by Thomas Pfau, 50-61. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1988.
Hradská, Viktoria. Česká avantgarda a film [The Czech Avant-garde and Film]. Prague: ČSFÚ, 1976.
Johnston, Claire. “Woman Cinema as Counter-Cinema.” In Notes on Women’s Cinema, 24-31. London: Society for Education in Film and Television, 1973.
Klimeš, Ivan. Kinematograf! Věnec studií o raném filmu [Cinematograph! A Garland of Studies on Early Cinema]. Prague: NFA – Casablanca, 2013.
Koubová, Alice. Myslet z druhého místa: K otázce performativní filosofie [Thinking from the Second Place: The Question of Performative Philosophy]. Prague: Filosofia, 2019.
Koubová, Alice and Eliška Kubartová. “(S)jednat performanci knihou” [Negotiating Performance in a Book]. In Terény performance [Terrains of Performance], edited by Alice Koubová and Eliška Kubartová, 12-26. Prague: NAMU, 2021.
Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language (1974). Translated by Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
Krauss, Rosalind. “The Cultural Logic of the Late Capitalist Museum.” October 54 (Autumn 1990): 3-17.
Krtilová, Kateřina. “Performativní reflexe: Rozhovor s Dietrem Merschem” [Performative Reflection: An Interview with Dieter Mersch]. In Medien-wissenschaft: Východiska a aktuální pozice německé filosofie a teorie médií [Media Studies: Departures and Present Positions of the German Philosophy and Theory of Media], edited by Kateřina Krtilová and Kateřina Svatoňová, 314-15. Prague: Academia 2016.
Lauretis, Teresa de. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington, IN, and London: Indiana University Press, 1984.
Menke, Bettine. “Ve vystupování (a mizení): Na jevišti a mimo něj” [Appearing and Disappearing: On- and Offstage]. In Mizení: Fenomény, mediální praktiky a techniky na prahu zjevného [Disappearance: Media Practices and Techniques on the Threshold of the Apparent], edited by Kateřina Krtilová and Kateřina Svatoňová, 125-51. Prague: Karolinum, 2017.
Mersch, Dieter. “Operation / Operativität.” In Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Handbuch zu Geschichte – Kultur – Ethik, edited by Kevin Liggieri and Oliver Müller, 287-90. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2019.
Mersch, Dieter. “Tertium datur: Introduction to a Negative Media Theory.” Matrizes 7, no. 1 (2013): 207-22.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16, no. 3 (1975): 6-18.
Parker, Andrew and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, eds. Performativity and Performance. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.
Pommeau, Jeanne. “Digitalizace filmů Jana Kříženeckého” [Digitalizing Jan Kříženecký’s Films]. Filmový přehled, 31 January 2020. Accessed 12 December 2025. https://www.filmovyprehled.cz/cs/revue/detail/digitalizace-filmu-jana-krizeneckeho.
Rich, B. Ruby. “The Crisis of Naming in Feminist Film Criticism.” Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, no. 19 (December 1978). Accessed 12 December 2025. https://ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/JC19folder/RichCrisisOfNaming.html. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
Svatoňová, Kateřina. “A Life in Images and the Dislocation Vision: Reflections on the Mediality of Moving Images from the Perspective of German Media Studies or Medienwisschenschaft.” In The Reader: The First Ten Years of Notebook for Art, Theory and Related Zones 2007-2017, 357-82. Prague: AVU, 2019.
Svatoňová, Kateřina. Mezi-obrazy: Mediální praktiky kameramana Jaroslava Kučery [Inter-images: Medial Practices of the Cinematographer Jaroslav Kučera]. Prague: NFA – Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Masterfilm, 2016.
Thomas, David. Vertov, Snow, Farocki: Machine Vision & The Posthuman. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
Uroskie, Andrew V. Between the Black Box and the White Cube. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Vertov, Dziga. Kino-eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov. Edited by Annette Michelson. Translated by Kevin O’Brien. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.
Wollen, Peter. “Godard and Counter Cinema: Vent d’Est.” Afterimage 4 (Autumn 1972): 6-17.
